Home / Contact / Stories, News & Reports / Photos
Worldwide Gay Life,
Sites and Insights Gay Jamaica News & Reports 2003-04 Also see:Gay Jamaica News & Reports 1999-2002 Gay Jamaica News & Reports 2005-06 Gay Jamaica story Caribbean Anti Violence Project 1
Jamaican Bays, Beaches Offer No Safe Harbor for People with HIV/AIDS
1/03 3 A Victory and a Reminder 7/03 4 Gays gain ground in Anglican Church (but Jamaica protests) 8/03 5 Gay rights in UK activists seek arrest of Jamaica reggae stars at Mobo awards 9/03 7 Jamaica: Queer in a Culture of Violence Cops are deadly, politicians corrupt, the people poor, and musicians sing, "Kill the fags, burn the sissies." 11/03 8 Police back campaign to stamp out homophobic reggae lyrics 11/03 9 Gay websites wary of Jamaica 3/04 11 OutRaged! British gays use Brian Williamson's death to push agenda 6/04 11a Slain Jamaican Leader Honoured in London 6/04 13 Beenie Man Show Scrapped in London 6/04 14 Amnesty confirms: Buju Banton accused of gay-bashing: Singer may be linked to a homophobic attack 8/04 15 Growing up gay in Jamaica--Michael's Story 9/04 16 Jamaican Business Joins Chorus Against Anti-Gay Songs 12/04 17 Same-sex honeymooners? Are we ready? 12/04
28 January
2003 by Richard
Stern, Director Agua Buena Human Rights Association These people are dying. Of about 25 who showed up on that Wednesday to see a volunteer Doctor who comes every two weeks, only one had access to anti- retroviral medications. Several were so sick with wasting syndrome and other opportunistic infections that they had to be helped up and down the stairs to see the Doctor. Jamaica's response to its AIDS epidemic seems to have been too little and quite late. Max, a 44 year old, the only member of the group who could afford anti-retrovirals (ARVs), told me that when he was seen at the local hospital a nurse refused to take his blood pressure after she opened his medical file and saw his diagnosis. Max buys his medications from LASCO, a local importer of CIPLA drugs which sells him a monthly cocktail of Duovir (AZT + 3TC) and Nevirapine for $120 US per month, about four times what CIPLA charges for the same cocktail if it is purchased in India. Gladys, 28, told me how her she had begged local hospital officials and then private Doctors to get medications for her five year old daughter Emily who was becoming more and more ill everyday. They told her to first to get a CD4 test for the little girl and she did not have the $100 necessary for this. The only CD4 testing in Jamaica is available at the University of the West Indies, Viral load testing is not available. Emily died November 17th. It is not clear why CD4 tests in Jamaica costs $100 when in many countries in the region the cost of this test is under $30 per person. It also not clear why Doctors needed a CD4 test in order to begin treatment with an obviously critically ill child. Presumably it is because they had no pills to treat her with. Joel, 26, who could not have weighed more than 90 pounds, is a former taxi driver alternately cried and slept while waiting to see the Doctor. He said he is lucky because his father cares for him, while many others have been thrown out of their houses. The Jamaican government does not provide anti-retroviral medication to any of the estimated 4500 people with AIDS who need treatment at this moment. 25,000 are estimated to be HIV+, and three people die each day of AIDS. The population of Jamaica is 2.8 million. Perhaps 150 out of the 4500 who need treatment have access to ARVs because they buy them privately or because they receive donated medications or have contacts with relatives in the U.S. Government officials told me the Health Ministry has no budget for anti- retroviral purchase. Ironically a $15,000,000 loan from the World Bank to Jamaica for AIDS related activities may be inadvertently delaying anti-retroviral access in Jamaica. Dr. Yitades Gebre of the National AIDS Program told me that the AIDS Program is currently focusing on how to utilize the World Bank money for prevention programs as well as for capacity building and implementation of infrastructure related to treatment access. But overwhelmed by its own incapacity to effectively absorb and utilize these funds, the government of Jamaica did not even submit an application to the second round of the Global Fund, last year, and the World Bank will not permit its funds to be used for anti-retroviral purchase. So the government of Jamaica is stuck with an excess of potential infrastructure, but no funds for actual purchase of medications. The victims of this unusual "embarrassment of riches" appear at this point to be People Living with HIV/AIDS who need medications now. World Bank money must also be repaid at some point whereas Global Fund money is allocated to countries without any need for repayment, although the Global Fund does require that sustainability of treatment be built into National AIDS programs. In his speech at the special United Nations Special General Assembly on AIDS(UNGASS) on June 27th, 2001, Jamaican Health Minister John A Junior stated that "we welcome the proposed establishment of a global health and HIV/AIDS fund and hope that the allocation of resources from the Fund will not be subject to bureaucratic impediments which would limit timely and adequate disbursements to those worst affected..." We tried to reach Minister Junior to find out why Jamaica is one of the very few developing countries which has not even submitted a proposal to the now established Global Fund, but he was unavailable for comment. This reporter discussed with Dr. Gebre other issues related to the situation of People Living with HIV/AIDS in Jamaica who need ARV treatment now. One trained physician (Dr. Gebre acknowledged that there are several physicians in the country with extensive experience in utilizing anti-retrovirals,) can easily treat up to 100 people per month or possibly more, especially if CD4 testing is available. The government will be using some of the world bank money to purchase a CD4 machine, thereby lowering the cost of the test. The trained physicians could train others. In "resource poor settings" what is needed for effective treatment are trained physicians and, ideally CD4 testing. Funds are now needed to purchase medications at the best available prices, and there is currently no budget approved by the government for anti-retroviral purchase, except for prevention of mother to child transmission. The World Bank Loan will undoubtedly enable Jamaica to eventually implement many excellent programs, but for those who need anti-retrovirals at this moment it appears that there is no plan in place. Another argument in favor of anti-retroviral purchase is the deteriorated state of the public hospital system in Jamaica. Those patients who are treated, rarely receive medications for opportunistic infections and the overall capacity of these hospitals to meet their medical needs is minimal. With anti-retroviral access, a high percentage of patients could by-pass the public hospital system --- if their treatment is successful, the need for hospitalization declines dramatically. They also could then return to the labor force, and their children would not be orphaned, thus avoiding an additional burden placed on the government. But Dr. Gebre gave no specific date as to when anyone with AIDS in Jamaica would actually receive ARV therapy, although indicating that the government is hoping to begin treatment for several hundred people this year. He pointed out that a country wide program is already in place for prevention of mother to child prevention. He said the government plans to eventually have four AIDS clinics in place which will provide comprehensive services for People with AIDS. Jamaica may at some point be able to apply for funds for a small number of anti- retroviral medications if the regional Caribbean proposal submitted by "CARICOM" (Caribbean Community) to the Global Fund, is accepted, but, according to Dr. Gebre CARICOM only has requested enough funds to purchase anti-retrovirals for four to five thousand people, which must be divided between all of the CARICOM member states. As many as 100,000 people currently need anti-retrovirals in the entire region. If the CARICOM proposal is accepted by the Global Fund Board, currently meeting in Geneva, Jamaica must then submit a proposal to CARICOM to receive its share of funds, but because of the regional situation, it seems likely that available funding from this particular source for medication purchase would only be sufficient for perhaps 200-300 people during 2003. A CARICOM official in Guyana confirmed that the Global Fund proposal submitted by the Agency includes $4.9 million yearly for purchase of medications for the entire 29 country regions during the next five years. At the current average cost of $1,400 per year per person. this amount would only cover treatment for about 3500 people yearly from the region, in which there are an estimated 500,000 people who live with HIV/AIDS, at least 100,000 of whom need treatment now. So Jamaica's share of funding for treatment, if and when the CARICOM proposal is approved by the Global Fund, is unlikely to cover more than a couple of hundred people per year, as Dr. Gebre indicated. Jamaica has benefited from price reductions resulting from the WHO/PAHO sponsored accelerated access negotiations. A cocktail combining Glaxo's Combivir and Merck's Indinavir costs $1622 per year and most other cocktails are available for between $1400-$1800 yearly as a result of these negotiations. Besides Merck and GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Abbot and Boehringer Ingelheim participated in this process. A private pharmaceutical company called LASCO is importing generic products sold by CIPLA. This reporter obtained a copy of the price list for LASCO products if purchased "wholesale." The combination of Duovir (AZT +3TC) sells for $600 yearly and Nevirapine sells for $432. Thus a cocktail of AZT + 3TC + Nevarapine costs $1032 yearly per person, while CIPLA sells the same cocktail to LASCO for about $360 per year. LASCO's mark-up is roughly 300 percent. (The same cocktail is sold by LASCO for $1420/year if purchased individually!) This author has traveled extensively in the Latin American/Caribbean region and has supported and encouraged the registration of CIPLA products. But it is dismaying to see the results of CIPLA registration, as this case illustrates. The purpose of my visit to Jamaica was to do a series of workshops related to advocacy and empowerment of People Living with HIV/AIDS as well as a diagnostic assessment of the situation related to Anti-retroviral access. One of the workshops involved a group of women living with HIV/AIDS who are members of "JN+" the Jamaican Network of Positive People. Several hours of intensive interaction revealed the degree of stigma and discrimination faced by People with AIDS in Jamaica. One woman explained it: "we would like to get involved in advocacy, but we are afraid. We could be kicked out of our houses, and what about our children at school? What will happen to them if people find out we have AIDS?" Another woman told me that a landlord went so far as to take the roof off of a house in order to "evict" a family of People living with AIDS that had refused to leave. There is no National AIDS law in Jamaica, and no law against discrimination. Aside from the other problems with the public hospital system, it appears that stigma and discrimination is commonplace. In another workshop, I was told that at Kingston General Hospital people with AIDS are segregated into a back corner, and routinely ignored by nursing staff. If they have no family to visit them, they will live in appalling conditions and are often discharged when they are still severely ill. NGO's go to the hospital on an emergency basis to try to find space in hospices for those who are being asked to leave. The stigma suffered by gays and lesbians does little to improve attempts to combat the epidemic. Gay sex, even among consenting adults, is still illegal under "buggery" laws enacted when Jamaica was a British Crown Colony. Prosecution may occur for public as well as private acts, and when arrests are made, names and addresses are routinely published in newspapers. This situation reduces the opportunity to do prevention work in the gay community which remains largely underground. "Batty Boys," as gay men are referred to, are subject to violent attacks as well. According to Jamaican scholar Thomas Glave, bottles of acid have been used in attacks on gays. Perhaps the most fundamental arguments for providing anti-retroviral access in developing countries is that it substantially reduces stigma and discrimination thereby enhancing prevention efforts and reducing costs associated with the epidemic. By providing People with AIDS with adequate medical treatment, the government is giving a message to the entire population that the lives of these individuals are worth something and their rights in the society deserve to be protected. Visibility is increased and the subject of AIDS is no longer taboo. Countries much poorer than Jamaica are providing ARV's with dramatically positive results. Dr. Peter Piot, Director of UNAIDS, Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, Director of WHO, and Dr. Joep Lange, President of the International AIDS Society all issued urgent calls for massive and rapid scaling up of anti-retroviral access in developing countries at the Barcelona International AIDS conference last July. Jamaica has a large contigent of AIDS experts from the International Agencies of Cooperation, including PAHO, UNICEF, UNDP, as well as CARICOM, working full time on the epidemic. I spoke to several of these same experts who are well aware of what is happening in Jamaica. Yet, concrete solutions congruent with the goals expressed by Drs. Piot, Brundtland, and Lange seem miles away from the pristine shores of Jamaica. It would also appear that the situation of the CARICOM Global Fund proposal may not have been well coordinated with other countries, if so few of the region's 100,000 or more people with AIDS are going to benefit by receiving treatment access. Technical advisors could have made it clear to all of the 29 member countries that the amount of money requested is far below was is needed to cover anti-retroviral access in the region. Or perhaps this was made clear, and Jamaica simply did not act. Richard Stern is Director of the Agua Buena Human Rights Association San José, Costa Rica Tel/Fax 506-234-2411 rastern@racsa.co.cr www.aguabuena.org Metro Weekly (glbt), Washington, DC ( http://www.metroweekly.com) April 17, 2003 2 by Randy
Shulman Most of the participants in Songs of Freedom, the resulting 75-minute documentary opt to keep their identities concealed - their faces blurred beyond recognition. But the stories they tell have a familiar ring - a ring that is sometimes unsettling, a ring that is sometimes triumphant. Though scrappy around the edges, Songs of Freedom remains a stark and, at times, brutally honest experience. As it moves from tales of coming out to stories of abuse arising from one of the most virulently homophobic countries in the world, it draws you into a gay existence that, in Washington, you cannot begin to imagine. Songs of Freedom film will have its Washington premiere at Visions Cinema next Thursday, at a one-night-only event at 8 p.m. Pike, who lives in Toronto, Canada, took time to discuss the genesis of the project, as well as his own personal journey as a filmmaker who found a society of gays ready to have their voices heard. METRO WEEKLY: What prompted you to go into documentary filmmaking? PHILLIP PIKE: I actually started my professional career as a lawyer, and in 1998 I was sort of at a crossroads in my life, thinking about what's coming up next. I was visiting a friend in Arizona and mentioned to him that I had applied to go to grad school with the aim of teaching law, and he sort of very gently suggested to me that I may want to think about doing something creative. I thought about that for a little while, and I got up one morning shortly after that and just decided that, yes, I was going to make a film. So after that I began to think about what I needed to do to make it happen. So I took some courses in video production. MW: How did Jamaica enter the picture? PIKE: I was born there, but migrated to Canada with my family in 1971 or thereabouts, I was about nine years old. By 1998 I was 36 and wanted to go back to Jamaica. I felt there was something missing in my life - here was this country where I was born and where I spent the first nine years of my life but I really didn't know a lot about it beyond what everybody else knew from music or newspapers. The two things sort of coincided in December of '98. I bought a plane ticket and I bought a video camera and I set out to Jamaica. And I really didn't know what I was going to do or how I was going to do it, I just knew I had my plane ticket and a camera. [While in Jamaica], I read that an organization called JFLAG - the Jamaica Forum for Lesbians, All-Sexuals and Gays, had just launched itself publicly. I made contact with them, and decided that my film was going to be about the life experience of gays and lesbians. I wanted to know how gay people were living their lives on a day-to-day basis in this country that has this reputation of a very virulent strain of homophobia. And I wanted to know like, what do you do? How do you get up in the morning, how do you live your life, how do you go to school? Just sort of basic human day to day sorts of things. When I began to talk to people about that, I was surprised at the range of experiences. I was surprised that some people were able to come out to their family and then survive long enough to sit down and talk to me about it in interview. MW: Most of the people interviewed had their identities concealed. But there were several who chose to speak very openly and frankly on camera. Larry Chang, for instance. PIKE: Well, I think Larry, through a combination of different circumstances, just got to a point in his life where he really didn't care anymore. He just decided that he needed to live his life out in the open. He has actually left Jamaica, but even while he was there, my understanding is that he was living his life quite openly. MW: What about "Bobby," who speaks of the atrocities performed on gays who are arrested and sent to prison? I was a little surprised that he chose to show himself fully. PIKE: That's an interesting story, because I was quite concerned about his safety. The segment was shot in June of 2000. I ran into him on about two or three other occasions when I went back to film, and I kept on asking him, "Do you still want to do this without your face not concealed?" And he said, "Yes." He was a very street smart kind of person, so I thought, okay, and went ahead with using him in the film. When we had the premiere in Toronto back in January, someone who was sitting next to me leaned over and said, did you know that Bobby has died? As it turns out, he died of AIDS in October of 2002. And so, since that time, the thought has occurred to me that perhaps he knew at the time we were filming, back in 2000, that he was ill, and perhaps in a way this was his gift to the community. Because he says a lot of things which are very crucial and important, especially for it to be said by someone who doesn't have their face camouflaged. MW: Bobby's is without doubt the most disturbing and upsetting passage in the film, just the horrors that he recounts. And yet, he recalls them in such a placid, gentle manner, it kind of throws you. PIKE: I think that is part of life in those circumstances. When you live in that environment for so long, you actually become detached from the reality around you in order to survive psychologically. I think that's what we're seeing in him. MW: Do the police go out of their way to arrest known homosexuals without probable cause? PIKE: It's hard for me to say. All I can share is the experiences I've heard about. I think what happens is if word gets out that you're gay, chances are you're going to be harassed. So they're going to pick you up, they're going to try to pin stuff on you that under normal circumstances they may have looked the other way on. A lot of the police officers themselves, in order to cover up their own sexual orientation identity, are actually some of the most brutal harassers, just because it's a way of masking their own sexual identity. MW: How did you choose your subjects? PIKE: A lot of people have said, "Why didn't you do man in the street interviews with the average Jamaican?" And while that's interesting, I think there will be other films to be made on the subject which will perhaps include that. But I really wanted this to be about personal stories - good, personal stories from the heart. I wanted to have a good cross section of people - Larry is a Jamaican of Chinese descent, for example - and I tried to get a cross section of class. And it was a very important thing to have gender balance. But most of all it's the people who are good storytellers who made it into the finished film. MW: You live in Canada, we live in Washington, and in both cities, we tend to take open gay life pretty much for granted. How did you feel, as a gay man, encountering so many people who have to live their sexual lives underground? PIKE: It's hard for me to see it as all bad or all good, right? It's a real mixed bag. But I think life is full of contradictions. Certainly, at a very basic level, life is difficult in Jamaica in general. Economically it's hard if you're a young person to find certain opportunities, it's hard to get a job, to retain a job. Friends of mine always jokingly say to me, "When you're in Toronto you can sort of take a holiday from homophobia, and when you go to Jamaica you can take a holiday from racism, right?" It's like, what do I want to deal with today? Do I want to deal with homophobia? Well then, if I don't want to I'll stay in Toronto. Do I want to deal with racism? Not today, well I'll go to Jamaica. A lot of gay men and women are fleeing Jamaica in droves, seeking asylum in the United States, here in Canada, and in the U.K. And they're being granted asylum, which is a recognition, I think, of just how bad things are. But while I don't think it's possible to overstate how bad things are, at the same time people get along, you know? Like Denise for example, who talks about meeting her girlfriend in Kingston, which I think is a wonderful human story. And so there's a way in which you kind of have to make the best of the situation that you're in. And that's why it was so important for me that the film convey these individual stories. For example, Miriam, the woman who talks about growing up in the ghetto and coming out to her family and being accepted - her story really blows the lid off a lot of people's preconceptions, including my own, that if you're from the ghetto, it's much harder to live a gay person. That certainly was the conventional wisdom, because people said to me often that the higher up the socio-economic ladder you go in Jamaica, the less your sexual orientation is an issue. But then along comes Miriam, who came out to her family, who was born and bred in the ghetto, and was accepted. Quite a number of other men who I interviewed off camera, who lived in ghettos, said the same thing - that their family knows, and a lot of the people in their communities know, and they're okay with it. But if someone from another community comes in to the ghetto, and is suspected of being gay, chances are that person is going to be stoned or stabbed to death. MW: Do you think the typical Jamaican male will ever be able to put aside his own homophobia and bigotry? That's a broad question, of course, but I'm curious as to your opinion. PIKE: I'm an optimist. I've been described as a dreamer, so perhaps I'm not the best person to give you a response to that. Because my response is I do believe that it is in all of our natures to change and evolve. It may take a longer time in that particular case because of Jamaica's history, but I think it will change nonetheless. It's been suggested to me that - and to a certain extent Larry alludes to this in the film when he's talking about his theory of the homophobia - Jamaica's experience of slavery was harsher, uglier, dirtier, use whatever word you will, than a lot of the other Caribbean islands and that's why the homophobia in Jamaica is of a qualitatively different kind than in other Caribbean islands. I have a cousin who went to law school in Cave Hill in Barbados. Now the University of the West Indies is a regional university, so in Barbados they would have had students from all the Caribbean islands, and she said invariably when it came time to talk about the sodomy laws in the seminars, it was always the Jamaican men who had the most virulent reaction to the conversation. Sure the Grenadian men or the Trinidadian men would react, but somehow the Jamaicans were just that much more over the top. So I don't know, maybe the Jamaican strain is more virulent, but I still think that it can change. MW: How has making the film helped you on your own journey as a gay man? PIKE: It brought together different parts of my identity, because I think in North America, I'm faced with this every day. Growing up in Canada, there were too many labels. I'm a black gay man. I'm an African-Canadian. Going back to Jamaica helped me to see myself as a whole person. I see myself now first and foremost as a human being. The fact that I'm black, the fact that I'm male, the fact that I'm gay, the fact that I'm all those other things that are identities in this particular society that I live in are now, for me, less important. The first and foremost are the human beings, and that's the level at which I want to connect with other people. So when I read this stuff about class, racial identity and the intersection of gender and race and class, my eyes kind of glaze over. Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to disparage it - I think the politics of identity is important, but I think it's only one step along the way. I think what happens is a lot of us get stuck in that one place where we can only see ourselves by these labels. You know when I walk into the bank you know, I don't tell the teller I'm a black gay man. I'm a customer - and that's enough to get me the services. I don't need all that other stuff. For me now, I can't think in those terms anymore, so when I read that stuff, it's just like that teacher in Charlie Brown - it just becomes a lot of goobledy gawk to me. So that was my journey, a journey of putting aside all of those labels and essentially just seeing this is who I am. I'm a human being and that's the end of the story. . The screening
will be followed by a panel discussion featuring Jamaican human rights
activist Larry Chang. 3
August
10, 2003 by Ian Boyne,
Contributor Said the Bishop forcefully: "This body by wilfully confirming the election of a person sexually active outside of holy matrimony has departed from the historic faith and order of Jesus Christ. May God have mercy on this church." In Jamaica
These clerics and others know that it is almost impossible to have a reasoned, rational and dispassionate debate on homosexuality in Jamaica. Even among the intelligentsia, it is hard to find people who can bring their intellect and not just their emotions to bear on the issue. And yet there is no ethical issue in which reason and intellectual astuteness is called for more urgently than the homosexual debate. Among the Intellectuals Don't believe that it is just the narrow-minded, "fundamentalist-influenced homophobic people" who are driven by their emotions in the homosexual debate. Even among the intellectuals who are gay, I have never found anything resembling a serious attempt to philosophically ground homosexual practice. Perhaps because of the bigotry, prejudice and irrational opposition to which they have been exposed, many homosexuals have grown to be frighteningly intolerant, arrogant, dismissive and defensive. Any objection to their practice is labelled "homophobic" - a catch-all word which dispenses with the need to reason. Justifying
Homosexuality Otherwise it's just your opinion against mine. Your prejudice against mine and your preference against mine. Or I kill you, chop you up or "bun you" if you are in the minority. It is time that we raise the homosexual debate on a higher plane than we are accustomed, both away from the level of our deejays and J-FLAG. Morality and Ethics The issue really comes down to asking a few basic questions: How do we determine morality? How do we know right from wrong? How do we establish ethics? And are there absolutes? The homosexual finds himself in a difficult position philosophically. If he is a secularist who rejects a transcendent reality (God) then he is likely to believe that ethics is socially grounded. That is, morality is determined by and derived from the social and cultural context, as there is no objective morality "out there". Morality is what a group of people determine - to put it philosophically, morality is a social construct. Now, if morality is a social construct and the majority of people in our context in Jamaica, and certainly in the developing world, have deemed homosexuality immoral and unacceptable behaviour, then on what basis does the homosexual deem it moral and acceptable? What gives the individual homosexual the right to determine morality when the voice of the people has spoken so clearly on this issue? But the majority can be wrong, the homosexual might retort. In the past the majority felt that burning witches at the stake was right; that stronger states had the right to conquer and dominate weaker ones; that women were inferior to men; that slavery was acceptable, etcetera. Some societies accepted that adulterers and sorcerers should be murdered, that cannibalism is okay and some even today accept the dreadfully painful female circumcision. Were and are these things right just because they are accepted by the majority? So the homosexual can reject the "tyranny of the majority". But what will he use to justify his conduct? The sovereignty of feelings; the sovereignty of desire. In his view, homosexuality is right simply because he feels that way; that that is his nature and to deny his nature would be inhuman and preposterous. Yet, what about people who are naturally attracted to minors? Don't come with the argument, Mr. or Ms. Homosexual, that that would not involve consensual sex and, therefore, sex with minors is inherently immoral. Some would argue that a precocious 12 or 14-year-old could conceivably engage in consensual sex. It would be against the law, but couldn't it be argued that it is not necessarily immoral? As a society we are revolted by the thought of a 12 or 14-year-old having sex with an adult in his 40s or 50 - as well we should be. But if the homosexual rejects societal norms and mores as grounds for establishing morality, then how can he conveniently invoke that to condemn sex with minors? Transcendent
Morality And the Christian church depends on the Bible and church tradition to determine morality. It is absolutely clear and unequivocal to me that both the Bible and church tradition resolutely and stoutly condemn homosexual practice. But the problem for the church is that since the 19th century and especially since the 20th century there has been increasing scepticism about the authority of the Bible - coming from the church's own clergymen and women. And there is a general cynicism about authority in Western culture anyway, so appeals to church tradition are losing their grip on both the educated and uneducated. Our secularised culture, in which individualism is primary - and the Information Revolution has buttressed this - is the major philosophical force against the church's view. The church, I predict, will increasingly cave in under the weight of secularism and liberalism. The church has already accepted so many tenets of the liberal culture and has been so short-sighted philosophically that it is now trying to close the gate when the horse has bolted long ago. As the Episcopal Canon Thomas Conley put it in a presentation in 2000 in the United States: "But what will happen to the church if we do ordain practising homosexuals to the priesthood and allow and bless same-sex unions? The first question I hear on this issue is, 'Do you think it is going to happen?' My response is yes. The reason is that homosexuality is here to stay. It is a reality of life and a reality of the church. It is not going away. The church will have to face it honestly and squarely. Reality cannot be ignored forever. There is an elephant in the room!" The
Price Of Freedom The naturally free and equal individual is a sovereign individual, since his freedom signifies that he is his own highest authority." This is why arguments about the unnaturalness of homosexuality, or its assumedly minority status - like left-handedness - or its being contrary to nature or the Bible are dismissed by the homosexual sovereign who feels he needs only follow the desires of his sovereign heart. Continues Berkowitz in his insightful essay: "Romantic love, in the era of freedom, comes to occupy the commanding position in the hearts of men and women. In a world in which one authoritative good after another loses its lustre, romantic love offers the hope of the transcendent in the here and now. Romantic love has its roots in the powerful push and pull of sexual desire." So Bishop Gene Robinson will not abandon his male lover of many years. The problem for the Christian church, not just the Anglican Communion, is that it has lost the philosophical and cultural battle with modernism and post-modernism. I predict that increasingly the world will set the agenda for the church, and the church will be following, with some sections kicking and screaming, right along the path blazed by secular society. The Lambeth Conference of 1998, with an overwhelming vote of 526 to 70 votes, reflecting more conservative forces of Anglicans in Africa, Asia and Latin America, rejected homosexuality as "incompatible with Scripture". But in an Anglican church which has over the years undercut biblical authority with its liberal readings of Scripture, the prohibition against homosexuality would seem strained. Get accustomed to openly homosexual priests and bishops for you will be seeing more of them around as the church continues to lose ground. Ian Boyne is a veteran journalist. You can e-mail your comments to ianboyne@yahoo.com. The Guardian, London, England http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/news/story/0,11711,1045314,00.html September 19, 2003 5 by Fiachra
Gibbons, arts correspondent Gay rights activists have presented Scotland Yard's hate crime unit with a dossier of evidence against Beenie Man, Bounty Killer and Elephant Man, three of the biggest stars of the Jamaican dance hall scene, which is notorious for its homophobia. Activists say they have all recorded songs which denigrate, advocate attacks on, and even encourage the burning of homosexuals. The gay rights group OutRage is calling for their prosecution in the light of the crown prosecution service's crackdown on threatening behaviour towards homosexuals and an initiative by the Metropolitan police to encourage gay people to report abuse and harassment. The solicitor general, Lord Falconer, told the Lords in December that "a crime would not actually need to be committed to convict people of incitement to violence against homosexual people". The attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, confirmed that the public order laws could be used to charge singers who incite violence against gays. OutRage's leader, Peter Tatchell, who was beaten by angry reggae fans when he protested against two of the singers outside last year's Mobo party, said: "My request for a prosecution will test whether the police and prosecutors are sincere in their pledge to get tough with homophobic hate crimes." Any charges could have severe repercussions on the singers and their record companies, he said. Music shops were likely to face court orders to withdraw offending discs. But the Mobos - which celebrate music of black origin - said that the offensive songs were recorded at least two years ago and were not therefore part of the nominations. Its spokeswoman, Vanessa Amadi, said that at least two of the artists had since distanced themselves from their lyrics. "The Mobos are nominated by the music industry - we simply reflect the industry. We do not support homophobia. "The lyrics in question are outrageous and disgusting, but they all have moved on from that. The work they are nominated for is not in any way homophobic. We are without prejudice," she said. None of the three is expected at the awards ceremony at the Royal Albert Hall in London next week, but stars often change their plans at the last minute. Chris Wells, editor of the black music magazine Echoes, said OutRage might be shooting itself in the foot by picking a fight with singers whose work would normally pass mainstream audiences by. "You are never going to stop this - no matter what you do - because Jamaica is a very religious society, and unfortunately, for all sorts of reasons, homophobia is deep there," he said. "These songs are sung as easily as a love song is sung here. No matter if they are prosecuted in this country, they are going to go on selling records in their thousands in America and elsewhere. Hundreds of artists are singing songs like this."
November 2, 2003 6 by
Petre Williams, Observer staff reporter
November 7, 2003 7 by
Kelly Cogswell Lesbians, gay men, and transgendered people are on the front lines, targeted for repression and violence from the dancehalls to the pulpits, and police stations. Against God and Jamaica In the 1980's, AIDS brought the issue of homosexuality out of the closet in Jamaica, but the violent backlash drove the small lesbian and gay community underground. Queer issues are once again in the hot seat, this time with the first confirmation of an openly gay priest as an Anglican bishop almost two thousand miles away. Jamaica's Christian pastors are united against it. Just prior to last week's ceremony for now Bishop of New Hampshire Gene Robinson, Kingston's Anglican priests gathered to reaffirm their opposition, voting 40-0 to reject his elevation. The rest of Jamaica's Christian pastors weighed in against it as well. Reverend Al Miller, president of Whole Life Ministries and pastor at the Fellowship Tabernacle, told the daily newspaper The Observer, "The scripture calls it an unnatural behavior; therefore it cannot be something that the church can support and condone." He went on to say, "God created nobody to be that way... it is reprehensible from a Christian position. It is totally inconsistent with the Christian church." But in a conversation with The Observer, Father Richard Johnson, of the St. Jude Anglican Church, may have revealed the cultural heart of his country's homophobia when he ended his denunciation by saying, "Jamaican society in general is intolerant of homosexuality and homosexual behavior... there is no way that a Jamaican Anglican contingency could begin to support such a decision." Blood out ah chi chi The denunciations from the pulpits have a far-reaching effect. Most Jamaicans are Christian Protestants heavily slanted towards an anti-gay, anti-woman fundamentalism, with the Church of God capturing 21 percent, Baptists 9 percent, Seventh-Day Adventists 9 percent, and Pentecostals 7.6 percent. Anglicans claim a mere 5.5 percent. The Rastafarian religion, which emphasizes traditional gender roles, is also no haven for lesbians or gay men. Though it is only practiced strictly by about 5 percent of Jamaicans, it has a much broader impact. Critically acclaimed musician Capleton has popularized a radical strain of Rastafarianism called Bobo Dread. One of his songs says, "Blood out ah chi chi/ Bun out ah sissy." Kill the fags, burn the sissies. Some detractors refer to Bobo Dread fans as "the Jamaican Taliban." Capleton's not the only musician inciting homophobic violence. Elephant Man, in A Nuh Fi Wi Fault [It's Not Our Fault] sings, "Battyman fi dead! [Faggots should die!] / Gimme tha tech-nine / Shoot dem like bird!" Spragga Benz, in his song, Nuh Inna Dat [We Don't Support That], specifically targets the activist group, Jamaica Forum for Lesbians, All-Sexuals and Gays (J-FLAG), when he sings, "Why man waan wine man in front a I man? [Why does a man want to dance with another man in front of me?] / That caan gwann inna my land [That can't go on in my land] / From east and west, north and south / Get ready and guns out / Get ready and guns out / J-Flag dem a brag and a talk bout / Out a di closet dem a go walk out. / But man nuh inna dat, dem betta stay inside and hide / For if dem come out, they might be shot." All of these songs were nominated for MOBO (Music of Black Origin) awards in London in 2002. When gay activist Peter Tatchell turned up to protest, he was punched, kicked and spat on until he took to his heels. His attackers used the songs as battle cries. It is no consolation that none of the songs won. Cops Nurture Violence Most victims of homophobic violence in Jamaica find it's a miracle if anyone intervenes, especially the police. J-FLAG has been documenting cases for the last few years. In one case this summer, a group of gay men were assaulted by their neighbors. It was a family affair. Both parents and children attacked using stones, a knife and a machete. "They were calling us names and threatening us so we ran. They chased one of us down, Lenni [not his real name], who has now moved to another country. When we met up with him later in the night, we saw that he was chopped on his face, neck, hand and back. He was bleeding bad, but just bandaged it up himself. The next day, we all went back to our yard and the neighbors tried to attack us again. We called the police. When they arrived we told them how we had been attacked and chased, but the neighbors began telling the police that we were battymen and that we had to leave or they would kill us. When the police heard this, they took sides with the neighbors." They then arrested the gay men for using foul language. On another occasion, a group of victims sought refuge in a police station from an armed crowd only to report to J-FLAG, "When the police realized it was a 'batty judgment' they began to call us battymen and told us 'battyman fi dead' [Faggots should die] and shouted at us to leave the compound. We were terrified for our lives as the group of armed men were waiting for us across the street from the gate to the police station." The police also instigate problems, using sodomy laws as justification to harass, and beat up perceived sexual minorities. One group of AIDS activists trying to hand out condoms and promote safe sex reported that after being accused of promoting homosexuality and taken to the police station: "The other police officers told us we should be dead and that the policemen should have killed us instead of bringing us into the police station." Lesbians: Women At Risk As women, lesbians get a double whammy of violence. According to a UNDP report, in 1998 some 100 women were murdered in Jamaica, most of the deaths occurring "as a result of domestic violence." In that same year 109 rapes were reported and almost 4,000 cases of assault against women. The gender power imbalance can also be measured by HIV statistics. The Inter Press Service reported in 2001 that Jamaican women were being infected with HIV at nearly twice the rate of men. They cited a statement released shortly before by the Caribbean Group for Cooperation in Economic Development that "women are economically and emotionally dependent, and are expected to defer to the male demands and decision-making." Those males are demanding women not use condoms. In 2000, a UNAIDS report suggested additional causes of infection throughout the Caribbean were "rape, incest, domestic violence and 'sugar daddies'" who extract sex in return for financial support. In this context, any woman refusing the advances of a man may be punished with violence and rape regardless of her sexual identity. It's worse when they actually are lesbians. Families use violence on their sisters and daughters to enforce traditional female behavior, including marrying and producing children. Ditto for gender variant people. In 2001, J-FLAG managed to document the case of one woman who was attacked by a co-worker she had often rejected. After finding out she was a lesbian, he accused her of being "unfriendly," and insulted her. When she made retaliatory comments about his wife, he punched her in the face several times, then hit her with a vase and a metal paper punch. Taking Back the Night - and Days The AIDS backlash in the 80's not only closed the five gay bars in Kingston, but pretty much shut down the Gay Freedom Movement dating from the 70's as the stakes of being out were raised. J-FLAG was founded in 1998 in response to calls for public input into constitutional reforms. Their first act was to submit a proposal to include sexual orientation in the non-discrimination clause. That was denied, but the group continues to push for the repeal of sodomy laws even though the major political parties continue to affirm them. Some reportedly even used anti-gay songs as campaign themes during the last election. J-FLAG relies on a three-pronged approach of legal reform, education, and support within the community. They offer sensitivity training seminars, run support groups and hotlines, record abuses, and assist with asylum cases, in at least four cases meeting with success. AIDS is also a priority. There are more than 20,000 people living with HIV/AIDS in Jamaica. Activists trying to hand out condoms and promote safe sex are routinely harassed by police. Worse, those who may have HIV/AIDS are too ashamed or afraid to be tested and seek treatment. Tony Hron, J-FLAG's Programme Director, says one of the challenges is financing. Because of threats of violence, "Most Jamaican gays are so far in the closet, they don't even want to write a cheque with our name on it, for fear someone at their bank will expose them." His most promising news was that doors were opening for collaboration with the human rights organization, Jamaicans for Justice, which "up to this point have declined to support us." J-FLAG is also receiving support from Black Gay UK which is sponsoring an online signature drive at http://www.blackgayuk.com/gay-rights/petition.htm for the sodomy law repeal. The Same Boat Spragga Benz sets out the real issue, the future of Jamaica, in his musical claim-staking quoted before, "Why man waan wine man in front a I man? [Why does a man want to dance with another man in front of me?] / That caan gwann inna my land [That can't go on in my land] / From east and west, north and south / Get ready and guns out". The fight for gay rights truly is a battle of national proportions because the problems of LGBT people in Jamaica are intrinsically linked to those facing the entire country: violence, poverty, disenfranchisement. Thirty-four percent of the population is below the poverty line. Elections are marked by violence. The police make their own laws. Vigilante violence not only targets "battymen," but anyone perceived as criminal or deviant. Instead of claiming ground for a minority, those fighting for gay rights, like non-discrimination, equal protection under the law, and the right to participate in the political process are actually working towards a better future for all Jamaicans.
11
November 2003 A senior Scotland Yard police officer has added his voice to those campaigning for action to be taken against reggae artists whose lyrics advocate violence against gay people. Detective Chief Inspector Clive Driscoll, of Scotland Yard's Diversity Directorate, has told campaign group OutRage! that, after reading transcripts of lyrics translated from Caribbean patois into English, he has concluded that "the transcript of the CD, in my opinion, does show offences." OutRage!'s campaign is focussed on thee singers: Elephant Man, Beenie Man and Bounty Killer, whose songs include lyrics urging the shooting, burning and drowning of gay people. Driscoll is sending the results of his five-week investigation to the Crown Prosecution Service for them to consider taking action. If successful, prosecutions could be made not only against the singers and their record companies, but also distributors of the tracks concerned - from high street stores such as HMV and Virgin, online music sellers such as Amazon.co.uk, and radio stations such as the BBC's 1Xtra digital station, which specialises in black and urban music. "We hope the Crown Prosecution Service will back the police and authorise prosecutions," said Peter Tatchell of OutRage! "It is disturbing that the CPS recently postponed a meeting with senior police officers to discuss the case. There is no excuse for delay. The gay community has every right to expect swift and effective justice."
March
22, 2004
June 10,
2004
June 13,
2004 PeterTatchell.net 23 June 2004 11a ”
Since Brian Williamson’s murder, the climate of homophobic hatred
and violence has escalated”, said vigil coordinator Brett Lock
of the gay rights organisation OutRage!.
June
24, 2004 New Times
is the only American news
organization to describe the murder and its aftermath in detail. June 25,
2004 |