Worldwide Gay Life,
Sites and Insights Gay India News & Reports Jul-Dec 2007 Also see: Also
see: 1 Lesbian marriage breaks up, girl slits wrist in court 7/07 2 Gay husband drives Bengal woman to suicide 7/07 4 Prince of Rajpipla Could Become First Openly Gay Indian Royal 7/07 6 ‘Asia must overcome HIV stigma’ 7/07 7 Response to above commentary (#21a) from member of AmmanRainbow (Jordan) 8/07 8 Transgender fights all odds to become 'top grade' artiste 8/07 9 Bold Bollywood gay film - '68 Pages' 8/07 10 Homosexuality And The Indian 8/07 11 Comment: Despite the fanfare, freedom still eludes gay Indians 8/07 12 The current situation with the Section 377 (anti-homosexual statute) 8/07 13 Gay friend's offer prompts youth to murder 9/07 14 Hundreds Celebrate Gay Prince's Birthday 10/07 14a Imagine a world without gays, says gay Indian prince 10/07 15 Prince Gohil interviewed on Oprah Winfrey TV show 10/07 17 Two Sabbavaram women tie the knot 10/07 18 Transgender to host TV show 10/07 19 Transsexual host breaks TV taboo 11/07 20 New Asia Pacific Statistics Reveal an Alarming Incidence of HIV in MSM 11/07 21 Asia-Pacific must do more to tackle gay AIDS crisis-group 11/07 22 Hijras on Haj:`We Are Neither Men Nor Women, but Muslims Like Anyone Else' 12/07
5 July 2007 1 Batala (Punjab): One of the two Sikh girls who entered into a lesbian marriage here last month slit her wrist in a court complex after their relationship "broke up" and has been arrested for attempting suicide. Twenty-one-year-old Baljit Kaur, the 'husband', took the step in the court of Judicial Magistrate Dimple Walia after Rajwant Kaur, 20, gave a statement that she did not want to continue the relationship, Senior Superintendent of Police R N Dhoke said. He said Baljit was immediately arrested and the court remanded her in judicial custody till July 19. Dhoke alleged that the marriage "broke up" as Baljit was having affairs with several boys. Hailing from Jat Sikh families in Hassanpur Khurd and neighbouringassanpur Kalan villages in Gurdaspur district, the two girls made news on June 15 by announcing their "marriage", the second single sex union in Punjab after 'Raju' and Mala of Amritsar. Baljit and Rajwant had run away from their homes on June 3, wedded at Vaishno Devi shrine in Jammu and reportedly vowed to fight religion and society to make the marriage a success. The couple had been staying at a women's home in Patiala and were traced by their parents late on Tuesday night. They lodged a complaint with Sadar police station that Baljit lured their daughter by claiming to take her to Canada after which the girls were detained by the police. July 4, 2007 2 Kolkata: On Monday, Preeti Verma could have celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. But she ended her life a day before that, on Sunday night, unable to bear the fact that her husband was gay. A few hours before she hanged herself at her flat in Kaikhali, on the northern fringes of the city, Preeti wrote a suicide note, saying her husband and in-laws had mentally and physically tortured her. On Monday, police arrested the 30-year-old houswife’s husband and brother Manoj. Locals alleged that Sanjoy, a jeweller, was gay and that Preeti was physically and mentally tortured by her husband and in-laws for raising a voice against her husband’s alleged physical relationship with his cousin brother. “Munna, one of Sanjay’s cousins, used to live in the same house. Locals are alleging that Sanjoy had a physical relationship with him and that Preeti was tortured for protesting. We are probing all allegations,” said an airport police station officer. The body has been sent for post-mortem. The police are questioning all family members to get more information on the case. Preeti, who hailed from Ranchi, married Sanjoy five years ago. According to Preeti’s relatives, she first came to know about Sanjoy’s alleged homosexual traits after going on a tour to Gangtok the year after her marriage. Munna allegedly used to have physical contact with Sanjoy in front of Preeti. Preeti used to protest but in return was allegedly tortured by her husband. “There was a constant friction between Preeti and Sanjoy over this issue. Preeti was made to go in for an abortion three times for protesting against her husband’s homosexual leanings,” alleged a local. However, Preeti’s father-inlaw S K Verma dismissed the allegation about abortion, saying that Preeti was depressed for quite some time as she recently had a miscarriage. “We had noticed that she had become depressed after her miscarriage,” he said.
July 6 2007 3 by Priya M Menon “They wanted to prove that they can live without the help of men. They also love each other very much. So we decided to forgive them,” said village elder Melka Powla. These are rare yet defining instances of defiance in a society which still hesitates to talk about sex and where homosexuality is a crime, courtesy Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. In a social setting where same sex love often leads to social ostracisation, police harassment and even suicide, members of this hitherto silent community are now making their voice heard. Last year, Prince Manvendra Singh Gohil of Rajpipla, Gujarat, drew international media attention when he publicly declared himself to be a homosexual. “I wanted to open a Pandora’s box,” says Manvendra. “That could have happened if only there is some controversy. I thought an Indian prince openly talking about his sexuality would make news.” And it did. His effigy was burnt and the royal family threatened to disinherit him. Though it was legally impossible, the resulting controversy triggered national debate on homosexuals and their rights. Interestingly, it is the emergence of AIDS in India that has enabled public discussion about homosexuality. "The HIV/AIDS issue has flushed homosexuality out of the closet," says Sunil Menon, founder member of Sahodaran, an organisation in Chennai that works with MSM (men having sex with men). Aditya Bondopadhyay, legal advisor to Naz Foundation International (NFI), a London-based NGO that helps set up and support community-based NGO's working with MSM, agrees. “It was recognised by the state that HIV is a problem and MSM are a high-risk group,” he says. “Groups initially started low-key, just spreading awareness, but soon realised that they cannot do it without addressing rights issues. For instance, if someone wanted to visit a drop-in centre, they had to be confident that police would not haul them up.” This does not mean that there has been no backlash. In July 2001, four HIV/ AIDS prevention workers from Naz Foundation and Bharosa Trust, Lucknow, who work with MSM groups were arrested by the Lucknow police, sparking off a controversy. "In a way it is a milestone that helped the movement in India as it motivated all groups in India to come out and protest; it proved that Section 377 is a law that needs to go," says Aditya. The Internet is another factor that has helped fuel change. “There are e-groups and discussion forums,” says Aditya. "Gay Bombay, a yahoo group, is now the largest group with over 16,000 members from India. This helps rope in professionals like doctors and lawyers from within the community.” Today, all over India, there are a number of groups that offer support, counselling and also focus on rights issues. But “coming out” is still a sensitive issue which can have far-reaching consequences. First of all, you have to come to terms with your own sexuality. “You need to have access to information and interact with other people with similar feelings and behaviour,” says Sunil. “Most people know they are gay but suppress it for they will not get any support from the family.” The burden of living a lie can take its toll. “I did get married,” says Prince Manvendra. “I thought I could become straight, that was my understanding of my sexuality in those days.” The marriage didn’t last and they divorced soon after. In 1997, he established the Lakshya Trust, a community-based organisation, which has been working in the HIV/AIDS sector since 2001. In 2002, Manvendra suffered a nervous breakdown. “The burden of lying to everyone was too much,” says Manvendra. “I was hospitalised and first spoke about my sexuality to my psychiatrist who told my parents." Coming out publicly can change your life forever. For Dr Hoshang Merchant, who teaches at the Hyderabad Central University (HCU), it was loss of his inheritance. “But I got my freedom,” he says. His open sexual orientation got him “kicked out of 17 houses in 11 months.” “I was also kicked out of my job as a Reader at Pune University when they realised I am gay; in seven years I changed 11 jobs,” says Hoshang, editor of Yaraana, the first anothology of Gay Indian Literature published by Penguin in 1999. That’s why coming out is advisable only if you are independent, especially financially. All the more so if you are a woman. “Where is a girl to go if she is disowned by her family?” asks Malobika, founder-member of Sappho, which was established in 1999 as an emotional support provider group for lesbians. “Coming out is still a very big deal.” In West Bengal, a young girl was tonsured recently for displaying “man-like” behaviour. Sappho, which runs helplines from 10 am to 9 pm, has more than 200 members now. “Many of the spouses of women who contact us have no idea of their dual life,” she says. “Some of them just want our help and stay in touch over the phone or by mail as they say their husbands are wonderful and don't want to leave them.” “In India it is fine to be gay or lesbian as long as you don’t ask for identity, validation and legitimacy,” says leading gay activist Ashok Row Kavi. “It is ok to be a gay man as long as it doesn't threaten the family.” He established the Humsafar Trust in Mumbai in April 1994 to reach out to the gay population. He also published the Bombay Dost, one of the oldest gay publications in Mumbai, to serve as a platform for sexual minorities. Though it wound up a few years ago, Kavi is thinking of reviving it, maybe make it web-based with an annual print edition. According to Sylvester Merchant of Lakshya Trust, even today, discrimination is largely due to ignorance. “For instance, many people think all homosexuals are pedophiles,” he says. But attitudes to sex and sexuality are changing. Kavi cites the example of a young boy who likes to dress up like a girl. “It is really admirable how his mother is handling it,” says Kavi. “She has explained his behaviour to the school which is also sensitised and learning to cope.” Even on the professional front, policies are becoming more liberal. “With MNCs coming to India and Indian companies becoming multinationals, today discrimination cannot be made on grounds of sexuality,” says Aditya. Hoshang teaches a pioneering gay literature course in HCU, the second such course in India. The First Annual LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) film festival organised recently in Kolkata by Sappho for Equality and Pratyay Gender Trust, was a huge success. Says Malobika: “We got an irate father-in-law who was very upset about his daughter-in-law being a lesbian. Though he was a doctor, he thought it was a disease. We counselled him, and when he left two and a half hours later, it was after donating Rs 200. The woman continues to stay with her in-laws.” A thorn in the flesh Section 377 of the IPC states that: “Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature, with any man, woman, or animal shall be punishable with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine.” This law, which was first passed in England in the 16th century to criminalise homosexuality, was adopted by the British for India, when the Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860. It was repealed in England in 1967 but is still in effect in India though it there is an ongoing campaign to repeal it. The Law Commission of India, in its 172nd report (on review of rape laws), recommended its repeal. In September 2006, more than 100 celebrities like Nobel laureate economist Amartya Sen, Booker prizewinner Arundhati Roy and writer Vikram Seth signed an open letter protesting against Section 377. The letter said the law had been used to “systematically persecute, blackmail, arrest and terrorise sexual minorities.”
July 2, 2007 4 by Elizabeth Joseph and Michelle Smawley "I was born with a golden spoon," Singh Gohil, who is now 41 years old, said. "A very luxurious lifestyle&at one point we had almost 22 servants for us. Even for a sip from a glass of water, it was the servants who got it for me." Singh Gohil was leading a life of luxury, but he was also living a lie -- hiding a secret so taboo that it caused riots in the streets of India. Singh Gohil is a prince, the son of the maharajah -- Indian royalty from a dynasty that is more than 600 years old. Today, though India is a democracy, the Singh Gohils are still honored as if they ruled the land. In fact, the day ABC News met with the king and the prince, they were attending a town ceremony honoring their family. 'Falling Apart' Singh Gohil's path in life was typical of the Indian elite: A good student, he was sent to boarding schools, took lavish vacations with his family, and went to college to study business and law. He eventually entered an arranged marriage with a beautiful Indian princess, one that marked the union of two prominent royal Indian families. When asked to describe his marriage, Singh Gohil said, "[It was] the worst decision of my life. It was a total disaster, total failure. I never had any sexual or physical attraction towards her. Nothing worked. The marriage never got consummated. I realized that I had done something very wrong." After 15 disastrous months of matrimony, Singh Gohil divorced his wife and took her parting words to heart. "The last time when she met me, she told me, 'I'm giving you a piece of advice. Please don't spoil another girl's life,'" he recalled. "That short and sweet thing hit me directly at my heart and I decided I'm not going to get married again." But in keeping with Indian tradition, the king and queen of Rajpipla decided it was time to find their only son another wife. Singh Gohil was reluctant to remarry, but had no one to share his feelings with, and said, "I was suddenly feeling as if I [was] falling apart." It was the beginning of a complete nervous breakdown. Singh Gohil wound up in the hospital, where he began opening up to a therapist about a lifelong secret he had been harboring since childhood. "[When] I was growing up, I would always get attracted towards males," he said. Sharing His Secret "My grandmother had actually sponsored this young boy, who was orphaned at an early age to educate him and be as a companion to me," Singh Gohil said. "We started experimenting with each other. I liked playing with him, playing [with] his body. He also used to play with my body." Singh Gohil was eventually introduced to Ashok Row Kavi, a former reporter who made waves in 1986 by becoming the first openly gay man in India. For many years, he was the only person in the entire country to speak openly about homosexuality. After becoming close friends, Row Kavi convinced Singh Gohil that his sexual orientation was nothing to be ashamed of. "I told him just live your life as honestly as possible without hurting too many people," he said. "You just live quietly and honestly and do what you think is right." Singh Gohil took his friend's advice and last March, gave an interview to a local Gujarati newspaper, outing himself as a homosexual. "I knew I was ready to face the worst situation," he said. "They cut out pictures from the newspaper where my interview was published and they put it in the bonfire. They declared me dead." 'Even a Prince Can Be Gay' Homosexuality is against the law in India, and can be penalized with ten years to life in jail. Singh Gohil has become both the voice and face of those persecuted for their sexual orientation. Not only has the Prince publicly fallen from grace, but his mother has publicly disowned him, and his place as the next King of Rajpipla was in jeopardy. As the only son of the current King and Queen, Singh Gohil is the only heir to the throne. His father, King Ragubir Gohil Singh said that, "It's not natural. Anything which is not natural, is not something which you can't procreate, you can't have children because it is not something which one is meant for. Otherwise there'll be no life on this earth." Though his coming out was met with disappointment and outrage, Singh Gohil has adopted a noble cause, educating people about homosexuality and HIV/AIDS prevention. "I came out in the newspapers openly that I'm gay and basically [because] I wanted to show to the world that even a prince can be gay," he said. "I wanted people to discuss homosexuality, which was always considered a taboo and a stigma& it's been existing in India but no one talked about it." Raising Awareness Gay activists estimate that 80 percent of gay Indian men are married to women, and argue that the widespread denial of homosexuality inhibits education of safe sex practices, resulting in a rise in HIV and AIDS in the gay population. "This is high time we talk about HIV [and] homosexuality," said Singh Gohil. "Unless we talk, there will be no awareness and it will start spreading and it will be too late&it will [get] out control." Singh Gohil created Lakshya, a grassroots gay-outreach organization centered around counseling gay men and teaching safe sex practices. The organization is still in the early stages of development. "There is a lack of awareness," Manvendra explained. "The purpose of my coming out openly is for a cause, for a good cause, for the control of HIV/AIDS." The prince who would be king is now dedicating all of his time and energy into gay activism. His future is uncertain, but Singh Gohil said that if he ever does take his place on the throne, it would be on his own terms, as the first openly gay Indian royal of the 21st century.
July 20, 2007 "The course of love ne'er did run smooth." Shakespeare 5 I called him ( he was working as an telephone operator in a hotel) the telephone operator of the hotel took and answered guess what??? he was in the other side and it is his voice , so i felt little bit shy brought my courage and started to whisper and he also found out that was me ( something was so attractive about him) i asked him weather can i visit him and he also said immediately yes...( because it was already 1am in the morning) As his
hotel is 20 minutes drive from my place went to his hotel and he
guided me to his cabin and made me hide behind the chair and talking
to
me( because they dont
allow visitors to come and c and talk to the people who are working in
the hotel)..
From that day evey moment was so enjoyable fun and frolic he took me
to his world and introduced me to his friends and his parents
(I was feeling
i was
in heaven) AS my parents were very strict and they dont allow me to go
out other than with them. It was a complete change fr me , the people
, the contacts
, the place .... disco.. night party.... all were the happiest period
of my life....(i thought).. One
day i
saw him with another guy ( hope u guys understand this he was too close)
i was
sad and could not concentrate in my work thousands of questions was
within me .. Why did he use me ???? for what i have done to him
and his family
cant he love me more ?????? ( i dont want to disclose what i have done
to the
family because even i was selfish at that moment that i wanted his
love... so i was
also knowingly or unknowingly expecting something in return his LOVE) Suddenly
i saw something which i ( my heart ) could not beleive .... HE
WAS HUGGING AND GOING WITH ANOTHER GUY IN THE
BIKE... my eyes , ears
, heart and hands became chilll... from that moment i learn to
start hate that person in my life...( if god only would have taught
me
How to hate
people!). .I saw
a cute 2 bedroom
flat
near
my home i
got that and his sister was ready with some 5 photos of
the girls..When he came
to india now in chennai he doesent have a place to stay
, so first time i asked my mom permission to make him stay with
me..
And now
my wife
, dont
know what
to tell her so with courage i told her can she move to
her mothers
place for a month as it would be a change for her also
.. ( she understood that i need
that time to be with ram) and she happily accepted it. He told me that as we are so long friends and have an such a good undesrstanding lets us make a difference in this world , let us show everybody that what two friends(gay) can do together , so he said he wanted to make my dream come true... (this time) So the project of opening up an resturant started.. he took me to Malaysia and i learned the delicacy of malayisan cooking and came back to chennai and started a pure vegetarian Malaysian resturant . The resturant was jam packed and we were not able to manage as it was a family run resturant his wife my wife and 3 cooks and 2 attenders; all of it was going on well my idea his money and my place( i have bunglow ) converted it to an resturant. My
Crazy Parents My mom all her savings gave to dad and his creditors and she also became 0 this all happend within a week . The whole family was upside down... My wife even though it was just one year of marriage gave of her jewellery to my dad and helped him with what ever she had and started to go for work.. Now the resturant was the only source for me and my family. Ram
came to our rescue he helped me in everybit of my life and gave
me courage to me
and my family his
wife was a
silent viewer
( later i understood she never liked it) . And
about my 'loving' parents--they fought with my brother also ,and
they both (mother and father} are living in
that huge house
all alone
and they say that is
what they want.
And the
restaurant (baby) what ram and i build
has been given for rentals and the rentals are
been enjoyed by my parents.(at least i
hope they dont misuse it in their fututre. I dont
know it
is true
or false or to
be debated but i
can live
with my head up and prove one day we
are successful in our personal life
and professional life.
July 20, 2007 6 "The population density in Asia is so great, with countries like India and China that have a billion people each, that infection rates just have to track up a few percentage points and you’re potentially looking at a catastrophe," Fauci told AFP. Cooper, the co-chair of the International Aids Society (IAS) conference, said responding to HIV was complicated by the fact that many suffers existed on the fringe of Asian society and faced discrimination. "We’re not going to have the generalised epidemics in our region that we’ve got in sub-Saharan Africa, we’re going to have explosive smaller epidemics," he said. "They tend to occur among drug users, also among gay men, sex workers or mobile workers such as truck drivers, fishermen who are more likely to pay for sex. In Asia, they’re stigmatised and discriminated populations. The trick is to get into these vulnerable populations and provide non-judgemental healthcare." Cooper cited China as an example of a country that had overcome its initial denial of an HIV problem but could go further if discrimination ended. "China is responding pretty well, their response has changed, they’re putting treatment in place and doing research," he said. "But people are still very much concerned about the human rights issues and how people with HIV are treated in Chinese society." China estimated last year that it had 650,000 HIV cases, although United Nations (UN) officials estimate the actual number is now higher. A recent paper in British medical journal The Lancet praised China’s adoption of schemes such as needle exchanges and awareness campaigns among gay men, although the UN said there was still resistance to confronting the problem at a local level. In India, where the estimated number of HIV cases was this month halved to 2.5 million, the government has set out to target the type of at-risk groups identified by Cooper. "They’re talking about upscaling programmes with marginalised groups," said Anjali Gopalan, head of the Naz Foundation, which works primarily with men. There was quite a bit of silence on them earlier." Indians with HIV are still often treated as social outcasts, with reports of doctors shunning Aids patients and HIV-positive children being barred from attending school with other pupils. In Cambodia, one of the countries hit hardest by HIV/Aids, the authorities are concerned that discrimination is helping the virus spread. "It is difficult for us since stigma causes infected people not to speak out and this quietly spreads the infection," said Ly Peng Sun, deputy director of the National Centre for HIV/Aids and Dermatology. "Bias can prevent us from fighting the virus successfully." Vietnam has introduced laws banning discrimination against people with HIV, although locals say it means some employers simply find a pretext to sack infected workers, rather than admitting it is because of their illness. "If this new law is effectively implemented, it will serve not only as a shield for the fundamental rights of people living with HIV...but also as a positive tool for fighting stigma and discrimination," UNAids Vietnam director Eammon Murphy said. Thailand has adopted a different tack to breaking down the taboos regarding HIV with innovative education campaigns such as traffic police handing out condoms, an initiative dubbed "Cops and Rubbers." The country, which has experienced about half a million Aids deaths and has about the same number of HIV cases, has slashed infection rates since it appointed a cabinet-level anti-Aids co-ordinator to oversee prevention efforts. It is also pushing international drugmakers over access to generic versions of newer and more expensive HIV medications that are needed to treat patients who have become resistant to the old drugs
7 Thanks for sharing. "After all being gay is being twice blessed—once blessed for being a man and second time blessed for being able to love another man." I loved this sentence and thought of highlighting it here! We are twice blessed :) Actually I loved the entire post of this man giving us an account of him becoming aware of his gayness. It is not far from what each single one of us has experienced. For me, it has been the same, I remember how much I used to like other guys while being a little kid. Guys at school, in the neighbourhood. Waiting for a guy to pass by in order for me to check him. Feeling happy when he says hi or talk to me...etc I have
never recognized that what I used to feel means that I am gay.
Maybe like the man, I was first intorduced to the word gay in my
8th grade, but in Arabic they say "Looti" in reference
to Prophet Loot and his assumed homosexual people! Here the world
'Looti' has no attachement to happiness whatsover, it indicate
very bad people with bad morals! I, myself, used to think that
Looti people are bad ones! Although in the back of my mind, those calls of had became stronger every day, especially at the university time where I fall in love with my straight best friend! I have never imagine him sexually, and whenever such idea crosses my mind, I used to fight it so that I dont feel that I am betraying our friendship. I have always tried to think about it as friendship love and nothing more, but obviously I was in a BIG denial phase. I guess
those strong feelings are what helped me realized my sexuality
and face my fears. Once I realized it, I instantly accepted myself
and knew what the kind of life I want to live. Now I am
blessed 3 times. Once for being man, a second time for being able
to love another man, and a third time for having the best man ever
to be my bf, lover and my life.
August 12, 2007 8 by Ajitha Karthikeyan, Press Trust Of India Nataraj's family came in for a rude shock when the child started dressing up and conducting like a woman. The child, who was thrashed, abused and isolated by family members and neighbours, found solace in the company of a classmate, Sakthi Bhaskar, who was also undergoing a similar transformation. An innate passion for dance in Nataraj was kindled after watching the films of danseus-actors Vyjayanthimala and Padmini in a village theatre. Ever since, it became 'her' burning desire to master the art. "I considered dance as a medium to express my femininity. I used to imagine myself as Padmini and imitate her movements. Fearing that people would ridicule me, I used to dance at secluded places with my friend Sakthi being my only audience. I had even practised in a graveyard," she recalls. With Nataraj's parents considering her physical condition an affront to the family's prestige, she walked out of the house at the age of 16. "I was forced to dress and behave like a boy, which I could never come to terms with. I felt like a free bird, the day I came out of the house," Nataraj says. Having come to the streets, life became a day-to-day struggle for Nataraj and Sakthi as they had to fight poverty, isolation and mockery of the society. But, the passion for dance never subsided. It was then she heard about legendary Bharatnatyam teacher KP Kittappa Pillai, a direct descendant of 'Tanjore quartet brothers'-- renowned musicians and dance masters who lived in the 17th century. When she came to know that Kittappa was the guru of her idol Vyjayanthimala and stars like Hema Malini and Yamini Krishnamurthy, Nataraj had no second thoughts and immediately packed off to Thanjavur, the cradle of Tamil art and culture. "There I was, a humble person belonging to the third gender, knocking at the doors of a huge kingdom of art. I didn't make any attempt to hide my identity and stood before my guru only as a transgender," she reminisces. Kittappa took her under his wings but not before testing for a year her steadfastedness and love for the art. He also rechristened her as 'Narthaki' (dance exponent). She became a full-time residential student and learnt the original Tanjore style of Bharatnatyam -- 'Nayaki Bhava.' She stayed with her guru for 15 years until he died in 1999 and learnt everything she could and practised vigorously. She also worked as his assistant in Tanjore Tamil University. It was only after her guru's death, she came to Chennai to carve out a space for herself in the art domain, that was hitherto dominated by upper-class Brahmins. From: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/ Thomas
Jackson Gay News Blog Also
see flim song clip:
August 17, 2007 10 by Sudhir
Kakar The assertion that there are hardly any homosexuals in India and yet there is considerable same-sex-involvement seems contradictory, yet simple to reconcile. Sex between men, especially among friends or within the family during adolescence and youth, is not regarded as sex, but masti, an exciting, erotic playfulness, with overtones of the mast elephant in heat. Outside male friendship, it is a way to satisfy an urgent bodily need or, for some, to make money. Sex, on the other hand, is the serious business of procreation within marriage. Almost all men who have sex with other men will get married even if many continue to have sex with men after marriage. Sexual relations with men are not a source of conflict as long as the person believes he is not a homosexual in the sense of having an exclusive preference for men and does not compromise his masculine identity by not marrying and hrefusing to produce children. As a recent study (Asthana & Oostvogels) tells us, "Even effeminate men who have a strong desire for receiving penetrative sex are likely to consider their role as husbands and fathers to be more important in their self-identification than their homosexual behavior." The cultural ideology that strongly links sexual identity with the ability to marry and procreate does indeed lessen the conflict around homosexual behavior. Yet for many it also serves the function of masking their sexual orientation, of denying them the possibility of an essential aspect of self knowledge. Those with a genuine homosexual orientation subconsciously feel compelled to maintain an emotional distance in their homosexual encounters and thus struggle against the search for love and intimacy which, besides the press of sexual desire, motivated these encounters in the first place. The "homosexual denial," as some might call it, is facilitated by Indian culture in many ways. A man's behavior has to be really flagrant, such as that of the cross-dressing hijras to excite interest or warrant comment. Some find elaborate cultural defenses to deny their homosexual orientation. The gay activist Ashok Row Kavi tells us about the dhurrati panthis, men who have sex with other men because the semen inside them makes them twice as manly and capable of really satisfying their wives. Then there are the komat panthis who like to give oral sex, but will not let themselves be touched. Some of these men are revered teachers, "gurus," in body building gymnasiums, who believe they will become exceptionally powerful by performing oral sex on younger men. Both will be horrified to be called homosexual. In general, classical Hinduism is significantly silent on the subject of homoeroticism. In contrast to the modern notion of homosexuality, which is defined by a preference for a partner of the same sex, queerness in ancient India was determined by atypical sexual or gender behavior. Some of our contemporary attitudes towards homosexuality go back in time to ancient India, where it was the homosexual (but not homosexual activity) who evoked society's scorn. As in several other societies, such as in Middle East and Latin America, the active partner in a homoerotic encounter was not stigmatized as much as the passive partner. It was what you did, whether you were active or passive, and not with whom you did it (man or woman) that defined acceptability. The Kamasutra's man-about-town who uses the masseur's mouth for sexual pleasure is thus not considered "queer"; the masseur is. Actually, in classical India, the disparagement for the homosexual was not devoid of compassion. The homosexual belonged to a deficient class of men called kliba in Sanskrit, deficient because he is unable to produce male offspring. The word (which has traditionally been translated as eunuch, but almost certainly did not mean eunuch) was a catch-all term to include someone who was sterile, impotent, castrated, a transvestite, a man who had oral sex with other men, who had anal sex as a recipient, a man with mutilated or deficient sexual organs, a man who produced only female children, or, finally, a hermaphrodite. In short, kliba is a term traditional Hindus coined to describe a man who is in their terms sexually dysfunctional (or in ours, sexually challenged). Kliba is not a term that exists any longer, but some of its remnant - the perception of a deficiency, and the combination of pity, dismay and a degree of disdain toward a man who is unable to marry and produce children - continues to cling to the Indian homosexual. It is instructive that the Kamasutra, the main source of information on ancient sexuality, does not use the term kliba at all. It mentions sodomy in only one passage, and that in the context of heterosexual and not homosexual sex: "The people in the South indulge in "sex below," even anally."(2.6.49). (In general Southerners have a pretty poor reputation in this book composed in the North, and it could be that their geographical position suggested their sexual position in this passage: down under). In the Kamasutra, fellatio is regarded as the defining male homosexual act. In Same Sex Love in India, Ruth Vanita argues that the relative tolerance, the gray area between simple acceptance and outright rejection of homosexual attraction, can be primarily attributed to the Hindu concept of rebirth. Instead of condemning the couple, others can explain their mutual attraction as involuntary, because it is caused by attachment in a previous birth. This attachment is presumed to have the character of an "unfinished business," which needed to be brought to a resolution in the present birth. In ancient texts, folktales and in daily conversations, mismatched lovers, generally those with vast differences in status (a fisherman or an untouchable falling in love with a princess), are reluctantly absolved of blame and the union gradually accommodated, because it is viewed as destined from a former birth. When a brave homosexual couple defies all convention by openly living together, its tolerance by the two families and the social surround generally takes place in the framework of the rebirth theory. In 1987, when two policewomen in the state of Madhya Pradesh in central India got "married", a cause celebre in the Indian media, the explanation often heard from those who could no longer regard them as "just good friends sharing living accommodation" was that one of them must have been a man in a previous birth and the couple prematurely separated by a cruel fate. In ancient India, homosexual activity itself was ignored or stigmatized as inferior, but never actively persecuted. In the dharmashastras, male homoerotic activity is punished, albeit mildly: a ritual bath or the payment of a small fine was often sufficient atonement. This did not change materially in spite of the advent of Islam, which unequivocally condemns homosexuality as a serious crime. Muslim theologians in India held that the Prophet advocated the severest punishment for sodomy. Islamic culture in India, though, also had a Persian cast wherein homoeroticism is celebrated in literature. In Sufi mystical poetry, both in Persian and later in Urdu, the relationship between the divine and humans was expressed in homoerotic metaphors. Inevitably, the mystical was also enacted at the human level. At least among the upper classes of Muslims, among "men of hrefinement," pederasty became an accepted outlet for a man's erotic promptings, as long as he continued to fulfill his duties as a married man. Emperor Babur's autobiography is quite clear on his indifferent love for his wife and his preference for a lad. We also know that until the middle of twentieth century, when the princely states were incorporated into an independent India, there was a strong tradition of homosexuality in many princely courts in north India. The homosexual relationships were much safer than relationships with mistresses whose children could be the source of endless divisive rivalries. It seems that the contemporary perception of homosexual activity, primarily in images of sodomy, can be traced back to the Muslim period of Indian history. As we saw, the classical Hindu image of homosexual activity is in terms of fellatio. In the Kamasutra, for instance, the fellatio technique of the closeted man of "third nature" (the counterpart of the kliba in other Sanskrit texts) is discussed in considerable sensual detail. I would venture to add that one reason Hindu homosexuals regard sodomy with considerable ambivalence, exciting and repulsive at the same time, has also to do with their strong taboos around issues of purity versus pollution; the mouth is cleaner than the anus. If male homosexuals make themselves invisible, then lesbians simply do not exist in Indian society - or so it seems. Again, it is not that Indians are unaware of lesbian activity. Yet this activity is never seen as a matter of personal choice, a possibility that is theoretically, if reluctantly, granted to "deficient" men, the men of "third nature" in ancient India. Lesbian activity, on the other hand, is invariably seen as an outcome of the lack of sexual satisfaction in unmarried women, widows or, women stuck in unhappy, sex-less marriages. This is true even in creative depiction of lesbian activity in fiction or movies. In Deepa Mehta's 1998 movie Fire, which sparked a major controversy, with Hindu activists setting fire to cinema halls because the movie showed two women having an affair, both women turn to each other only because they are deeply unhappy in their marriages. In ancient India, lesbian activity is described in the Kamasutra at the beginning of the chapter on harems where many women live together in the absence of men. What the queens have is just one king, preoccupied with affairs of state, to go around. Since none of the kings can be the god Krishna, who is reputed to have satisfied each one of his sixteen thousand wives every night, the women use dildos, as well as bulbs, roots or fruits that have the form of the male organ. The implication is that lesbian activity takes place only in the absence of the "real thing." There are hints on other kinds of lesbian activity in the ancient law books: a woman who corrupts a virgin is to be punished by having two of her fingers cut off - a pointer to what the male author think two women do in bed. The harsh punishment is not for the activity itself but for the "deflowering," the heinous crime of robbing a young girl of her chastity. Not surprisingly, it seems that female homosexuality was punished more severely than homosexuality among men; out of concern for the protection of women's virginity and sexual purity, traditionalists would say; to exercise control over women's sexual choice and activity, modern feminists would counter. In general, then, India has a tradition of "benign neglect" of alternate sexualities, a tradition that is very much a part of the Indian mind. The laws against homosexual activity, such as the act of 1861, are all examples of a repressive Victorian moral code. It is ironical that reactionaries, both Hindu and Muslim, who reject homosexuality as a decadent Western phenomenon subscribe to the same foreign code that is so alien to the Indian tradition. The Indian tradition of indifference or deliberate ignorance is also incompatible with the model of the Western gay movement, which is beginning to make inroads into our metropolises. In its insistence on the politics of a gay identity, of a proud or at least defiant assertion of homosexual identity, this movement is beginning to compel the rest of society to confront the issue publicly. ----------------From GayBombay Yahoo Group September 27, 2007 Response to Little India Article I am sorry, I cannot disagree with Sudhir Kakar more when he says that it's only amongst the English speaking milieu that you find the self-identified homosexuals. As an
outsider, he obviously does not have access to the gay networks
that exist in small-town India or for that matter even in the metros. I remember decades ago when in remote parts of India men attended gay `conferences' , a euphemism for parties for having oodles of sex. Yes, most of those who participated in these sexapades finally got married and fathered children. These marriages of convenience happen even today, in small towns and in the metros and is because it is seen as the best way to survive in a heterosexual society without attracting societal censure - invisibilising their preference allows them to have, as they would like to believe, the best of both worlds. A practical subterfuge, which should not lead us to believe that they ever have any doubts regarding their sexual orientation. Yes, komat panthis who like to give oral sex, but will not let themselves be touched, are a reality. But the body-building gurus who ingest `young' semen to fortify themselves is, if at all, an exception ? a stray homosexual akhaada master justifying his quirk - and is more likely than not a lurid fantasy of a fertile mind. I have great respect for Mr. Sudhir Kakar, but such essays despite their scholastic tone are simply misrepresentative
15th August 2007 11 As India celebrates the 60th anniversary of its independence from Britain, Balaji Ravichandran explains why he feels neither free nor independent. The celebrations started well before I arrived in India six weeks ago. From the moment I switched on the television at home the advertisements, programmes and notices, often painfully jingoistic in their self-congratulation, have constantly greeted me with their patriotic screams. This is not limited to the Indian media, of course; the big international players, including and especially the BBC and CNN, all have an entire series of programmes dedicated to celebrating 60 years of Indian and Pakistani independence. And why shouldn't they? A booming market economy, a rising consumerist middle-class, and a greater prominence on the international stage all mean that every move that the world’s largest democracy makes will be closely watched and scrutinised. Almost all of my friends and relatives consider themselves 'Indian,' and are celebrating the 60th anniversary of independence from the erstwhile British Empire today. I hold an Indian passport, and was born and brought up here for the first twenty years of my life. I do not call myself 'Indian,' inasmuch as I would not call myself British or American if I was born in the UK or in the US. That's just a personal preference. But, by definition, and by virtue of my passport, my nationality happens to be Indian. Even as an impartial observer, I have reasons to celebrate India's independence, its vibrant and thriving democracy, and its prominent role in the world economy, even as I mourn its many failures. Despite all this, I consider myself to be neither free nor independent; and no, I'm not celebrating. Why? I am almost a completely open gay man (the exception is my father, who doesn't yet know), I am still metaphorically imprisoned by the archaic laws which define any form of sexual activity outside heterosexual vaginal intercourse as abnormal, and thereby make them illegal. That is to say, homosexuality, under the definition of 'unnatural carnal intercourse' is illegal, and punishable with unlimited fine, and either 10 years in prison, or life imprisonment. For a nation which is supposedly rid of its colonial past, this medieval law, passed by the British when they ruled India, restricts the freedom of tens of millions (if not hundreds) of Indians on the basis of their sexuality, something that is as innate as gender or race. The common excuse for inaction is that the law is ambiguous, and that it has never been seriously used to imprison homosexuals or other sexual minorities. Intimately tied with this excuse is another, namely that the main targets of this law are not homosexuals or bisexuals, but paedophiles and serial rapists and killers. What nonsense! Implied, and often verbally stated, in these two excuses is the assumption that it is OK to construe sexual plurality and such vices as paedophilia and rape (which, according to Indian law, is a phenomenon confined to women; men, apparently, cannot be raped). More worrying is the fact that despite its ambiguity, and the relative lack of prosecution, it is used almost on a daily basis by the police to commit serious institutional abuses, including harassment, blackmail, extortion, torture, and even rape or murder. A year ago, police in Lucknow went undercover on a gay dating website, and subsequently arrested several professional men on charges of running a "gay racket." Suffice it to say that their personal and professional fates were sealed then and there. Two years earlier, the offices of the well-known Naz Foundation was ransacked, and its employees arrested, on the charges of "promoting homosexuality" by the same moralistic police. Technically it is still not illegal if someone were to arrest me just for being gay. There is yet another common myth which is often touted when poor homosexuals highlight their plight nationally and internationally, namely that things are changing in India for the better. Wishful thinking is all I can say to such misguided activists. True, the plight of sexual minorities has gained some prominence in recent years. But whatever positive light has been thrown on them has been neutralised, if not effaced, by the equally negative, blatant misinformation spread by overenthusiastic filmmakers and media, and more commonly by the India’s moral police, the right-wing political parties. For every Fire, there is one Girlfriend or Vettaiyadu Vilayadu. The former portrayed lesbianism in a positive and sensible light; the latter portrayed lesbians and homosexual men as murderous psychopaths. For every editorial in the elite English newspapers urging decriminalisation of homosexuality, there are two editorials in regional and political publications advocating stricter penalties for sexual diversity, often supporting, as Nigeria and Iran do, the death penalty. And while most English-language news channels do talk openly about homosexuality, every English movie channel, and there are almost a dozen in India now, censors any form of intimacy between two men or two women. Even an intimate embrace is often censored, let alone two men or women kissing. There is no use blaming the media or the politicians alone; the Indian mind-set, which historically embraced sexual diversity, is now overwhelmingly against homosexuality. Nor is it fair to allocate blame to the Brits or to the Muslim rulers. The south of India seems, so long as records exist, to have always been homophobic. The situation probably won't change for a long time to come. Sexuality, at large, is a taboo here, let alone alternative sexualities. At the moment, even a simple sex education programme in schools is banned in a dozen different states across India, despite the fact that India has a disproportionately large AIDS burden. To help effect a meaningful change in the average Indian mind-set, the only force that may prove worthwhile is spreading awareness through education. And that's where the politicians, the media (national or international) and particularly the mute celebrities (who fear their careers) can help. If politicians underestimate the value of political will, the media and celebrities of their influence, and educators of their responsibility, can India really progress in being a truly independent state? The issue is glaringly obvious in India's well-known weaknesses, poverty, starvation, malnutrition, and the generally poor state of public services and health care. As India's stature in the world rises, can attitudes towards sexuality be left far behind? Here I am, born and brought up in India, gay and single, shunned and ostracised by a large section of the society. I cannot love someone the way my parents love each other, and I cannot express that love physically, mentally, emotionally or legally. If I dared do so, I could face a lifetime in India's filthy prison, state-sanctioned houses of torture. What use then is India's independence to me?
Aug 23, 2007 Posted
by: "Vikram" vgd67@yahoo.co.uk vgd67 Reply: Since judges in India do not have overlong tenures, it might not be a bad idea to wait till younger, more sympathetic judges come along. Anyway, that's a practical matter for the lawyers who are actually fighting the case. Besides I should point out that even in limbo the case has helped in some ways. People do seem to know there is a case and that the matter is being taken up, so that its not like there is not push for gay rights in India. There was a case in Goa not long back where a foreigner who was being held on VERY dubious grounds related to s.377 was given bail by a judge who said that he knew there was a legal case to change the law so we couldn't pretend we were living in medieval tumes as far as gay rights goes. Things are changing, there's more public awareness and hopefully acceptance. |